The exam will be open book and open notes--but of course that means that I expect more from your answers than on the mid-term exam!
You will write one essay in response to a question on Invisible Man. This essay will be similar to the ones you wrote for your mid-term.
You will write a second essay on what it means to call someone a major American author. This will be an argumentative essay in which you provide evidence to support your claims. Some questions you may want to consider: What are the criteria for applying that label? Who gets to decide who is and who isn't major? Other than an accident of geography, is there some quality or attitude that makes someone a specifically "American" author? Should we still have a "Major American Authors" course at UNC? What do we gain from reading major American authors? Do their texts give us something that other authors don't?
You must cite and analyze at least 3 examples from our readings this semester: one of those examples may be a counterexample (e.g., "this scene illustrates that X is NOT a major American author because..."); the other 2 should be examples that support your definition. When you're providing your evidence, be specific and detailed. Your examples should be specific passages, scenes, or characters, not the entire text. In other words, these would be poor answers: "Emily Dickinson is a major American author because she wrote beautiful poetry" or "The Narrative of Arthur Gordon Pym proves that Poe is a major American author because it's an important and interesting novel."
Thoughtful, creative, and/or original answers will be rewarded. Snarky answers may or may not be, depending on my mood. Don't forget your blue book.
Thursday, April 23, 2009
Thursday, April 16, 2009
I
The narrator's search for his identity is the main them of IM. One of the things I noted in the last bit of reading was the narrator's collection of significant items. Someone mentioned in class to pay attention to the brief case, which contained his diploma, his scholarship, the broken bank, and his brotherhood name. He also adds to his collection when he gets the paper doll from clifton, the anonymous letter, his rinehart-glasses, and brother Tarp's chain link. His entire struggle to find his identity is in his briefcase and i feel like the items symbolize something; old slavery and new racism, and the falseness of bledsoe and the brotherhood. The narrator undergoes a transformation when he falls through the manhole and is trapped. He is haunted by visions of all his former leaders/mentors and then decides he's going to stay in the hole and plan from there. We know by the prologue what happens and I wonder if the narrator has taken up a more nationalist mentality? He denounces the white leader of the brotherhood and we know from the prologue that he attacks the white man in the street. What is his new role in society? What faction does he fit into? Is he more like Ras the Destroyer than he thought?
Easy to Relate to
My first thoughts throughout reading this book revolved around the narrator making everything way more dramatic than it actually should be. The concept of invisibility and his struggles with it were drug out incredibly far. However, I never hated it. Ellison has such a great way with words that he writes things in a way for many people to relate to. Upon reading the narrators struggle with identity towards the end of the novel, I really saw that I could relate. The best place to really explain this is in the range of pages 506-512ish.
Wednesday, April 15, 2009
racism is not the central theme; identity is.
Ralph Ellison the motivation speaker, like our narrator the motivational speaker, would say "I'm riding the race I'm forced to ride" when talking about the presence of class conflict and the oppression of african americans in Invisible Man. Racism is not the theme of this novel; it is ubiquitous because in the context of the time, it was inextricable and extremely relevant to the theme: the lifelong search for self-aware identity.
Ellison asks questions about class struggle through his characters - how does one ask a black man to sing without offending him? or, if the Brotherhood is not acting on behalf of the black race, what are they doing? - to lead the ruminating reader to wonder if the class struggle is more than about elevating the black race. (a ruminant is literally an animal like a cow that lives on something with negligible nutritional content like grass, and to compensate for low calories, protein, fat, vitamins, et cetera that you need to run a huge animal like a cow, the cow has to eat all day and have four stomachs to rip apart and combine everything. the ruminating reader must sift through questions and digest a lot of diverse incidents in Invisible Man to find any answers.) Recurring examples of identity crises and the progression of the narrator in relation to racism make me believe that Ellison writes about class struggle as another system of taxonomy for ones identity.
The narrator struggles with his self perception because he is comfortable in many systems that name him, instead of naming himself and letting his actions follow. He is a part of various institutions: 1.the south 2.college 3.blacks 4.the brotherhood. For the first half of the book, the Narrator's actions are determined by others because his position requires him to be vulnerable to circumstance. It can be argued that his entire life progress to New York City and beyond was determined by others - he went to college because he had a scholarship, he drove Mr. Norton to the Golden Day, he went to New York because Dr. Bledsoe gave him the letters. (I think that the deprecating letters were another of Ellison's and Bledsoe's hints to take a stand for yourself. They were written after the Narrator had resigned himself to his absurd fate without a fight, agreeing not to be bitter.)
The narrator's life of circumstance ends after a circumstantial hospitalization and strange rebirth scene. What is purged from his system is his affiliation to everything, he is a clean slate. And though he is without drive or purpose, he is not without history or education. He is reminded to be earnest in Central Park when he tastes the orange sweetness of loyalty to his upbringing. He summons forth his refined competence for the melodic cadence of speech writing from years of listening to talented sermons (practice and listening is how one develops jazz improvisation! - I can hardly see how speeches are different.) A man with a wealth of talent was once crippled by the obligations his role was expected to fulfill, and when he lost everything, he created the space to seek success that is not gilded. After biting the sweet potato the narrator asks, "What and how much had I lost by trying to do only what was expected of me instead of what I myself had wished to do?" (the person who read my book before me put a check next to that, so it must be important.)
The funeral speech struggles along and falters like Narrator's raw and shifting emotion. For this reason it is the most accurate depiction of the author's genuine sentiment. In a series of speeches for the brotherhood, the conflict between extemporization and prescriptive, deliberate, scientific speech making recurs. Faced with another institution of questionable morality, the Brotherhood, the narrator finally has enough self-assuredness and clarity to buck the system. He is moved to fight on behalf of the negro race not because another person demands it, but because the narrator's own morality demands that he fight for freedom of expression in any manifestation.
nyssa collins
Ellison asks questions about class struggle through his characters - how does one ask a black man to sing without offending him? or, if the Brotherhood is not acting on behalf of the black race, what are they doing? - to lead the ruminating reader to wonder if the class struggle is more than about elevating the black race. (a ruminant is literally an animal like a cow that lives on something with negligible nutritional content like grass, and to compensate for low calories, protein, fat, vitamins, et cetera that you need to run a huge animal like a cow, the cow has to eat all day and have four stomachs to rip apart and combine everything. the ruminating reader must sift through questions and digest a lot of diverse incidents in Invisible Man to find any answers.) Recurring examples of identity crises and the progression of the narrator in relation to racism make me believe that Ellison writes about class struggle as another system of taxonomy for ones identity.
The narrator struggles with his self perception because he is comfortable in many systems that name him, instead of naming himself and letting his actions follow. He is a part of various institutions: 1.the south 2.college 3.blacks 4.the brotherhood. For the first half of the book, the Narrator's actions are determined by others because his position requires him to be vulnerable to circumstance. It can be argued that his entire life progress to New York City and beyond was determined by others - he went to college because he had a scholarship, he drove Mr. Norton to the Golden Day, he went to New York because Dr. Bledsoe gave him the letters. (I think that the deprecating letters were another of Ellison's and Bledsoe's hints to take a stand for yourself. They were written after the Narrator had resigned himself to his absurd fate without a fight, agreeing not to be bitter.)
The narrator's life of circumstance ends after a circumstantial hospitalization and strange rebirth scene. What is purged from his system is his affiliation to everything, he is a clean slate. And though he is without drive or purpose, he is not without history or education. He is reminded to be earnest in Central Park when he tastes the orange sweetness of loyalty to his upbringing. He summons forth his refined competence for the melodic cadence of speech writing from years of listening to talented sermons (practice and listening is how one develops jazz improvisation! - I can hardly see how speeches are different.) A man with a wealth of talent was once crippled by the obligations his role was expected to fulfill, and when he lost everything, he created the space to seek success that is not gilded. After biting the sweet potato the narrator asks, "What and how much had I lost by trying to do only what was expected of me instead of what I myself had wished to do?" (the person who read my book before me put a check next to that, so it must be important.)
The funeral speech struggles along and falters like Narrator's raw and shifting emotion. For this reason it is the most accurate depiction of the author's genuine sentiment. In a series of speeches for the brotherhood, the conflict between extemporization and prescriptive, deliberate, scientific speech making recurs. Faced with another institution of questionable morality, the Brotherhood, the narrator finally has enough self-assuredness and clarity to buck the system. He is moved to fight on behalf of the negro race not because another person demands it, but because the narrator's own morality demands that he fight for freedom of expression in any manifestation.
nyssa collins
Glass Eye
I feel that Brother Jack's glass eye is significant. Jack states that the glass eye justifies his authority and shows the sacrifice he has made for the Brotherhood. However, the narrator later retorts that the sacrifice of the leaders is of their own doing and is justified as they have authority and knowledge of their own actions. What is not right is the sacrifice of the lower members who do not have say (kind of like taxation--> taxation of senators is definately justifiable as they are the one who spend the money, while taxation of those who are not represented is wrong because these people have no say in government and do not benefit, but give all the sacrifice).
More importantly the loss of an eye represents the white perspective towards their black conterparts. Jack's half-blindness causes him to compensate for his handicap by predicting people's action and having the authority to know where people are at all times. The narrator did not know this until it was too late. In the same way, the white leaders of the Brotherhood appear to be all seeing and empathetic to both the white world and the black world, but rather they only see one perspective--the white perspective on racism--just as Jack can only see through one eye, even though he pretends to see out of his dead eye just as the white leaders pretend to see the black perspective. Furthermore, the white leaders place extensive authority on the black brothers, wanting to know their whereabouts and motives, not because they actually have interest in the movement, but rather so they can promote their own interests and have full confidence in their power.
More importantly the loss of an eye represents the white perspective towards their black conterparts. Jack's half-blindness causes him to compensate for his handicap by predicting people's action and having the authority to know where people are at all times. The narrator did not know this until it was too late. In the same way, the white leaders of the Brotherhood appear to be all seeing and empathetic to both the white world and the black world, but rather they only see one perspective--the white perspective on racism--just as Jack can only see through one eye, even though he pretends to see out of his dead eye just as the white leaders pretend to see the black perspective. Furthermore, the white leaders place extensive authority on the black brothers, wanting to know their whereabouts and motives, not because they actually have interest in the movement, but rather so they can promote their own interests and have full confidence in their power.
Burn the past, find your future
For me, the most pivoting scene in all of Invisible Man comes when the narrator is forced to burn everything in his briefcase for a few brief moments of light. Never in my life have I come across a scene with more symbolism than this one. Although there are many ways to take this scene, readers can get just as much out of it without ever even considering the metaphors explicitly. It needs no analyzation; it is a simply beautiful portrait of the narrator’s last moments as a visible man.
However, it is certainly able to be analyzed. Obviously, all of the items being burned are the narrator’s most prized possessions. These possessions comprise the narrator’s past; they are souvenirs of a naive life, a life in which he thought he could be the catalyst for change. Ellison writes, “I realized that to light my way out, I would have to burn every paper in the brief case.” With multiple people chasing him literally to death, the narrator’s only way to find the path to survival is the burn everything left behind him. Although sometimes we survive by fighting, many times, we survive by “yessing.” We must accept what has been given to us and docilely let go of previous battles... we must become invisible.
However, it is certainly able to be analyzed. Obviously, all of the items being burned are the narrator’s most prized possessions. These possessions comprise the narrator’s past; they are souvenirs of a naive life, a life in which he thought he could be the catalyst for change. Ellison writes, “I realized that to light my way out, I would have to burn every paper in the brief case.” With multiple people chasing him literally to death, the narrator’s only way to find the path to survival is the burn everything left behind him. Although sometimes we survive by fighting, many times, we survive by “yessing.” We must accept what has been given to us and docilely let go of previous battles... we must become invisible.
PUPPETS!
I guess I am still really moved by the scene of Clifton’s death. The irony and the tragedy of the scene left me really feeling some of the betrayal and confusion that the narrator lives with. I think Clifton’s death is really symbolic and intense because it shows that a very smart and capable young man can “plunge” into the bottom of society, become the very characture he is fighting against, so quickly. The doll exemplifies the worst of racist thought in being a dancing sambo, but more interestingly I think is that the narrator carries it around in his pocket. Because he now has the chain that was given to him and this sambo doll, which I feel like shows that he is still tied down (or “chained” down…) to this racist depiction of blacks. Also the dolls points out how dependent the narrator still is on the (I think) white organizers of the movement, and how both he and Clifton were just pawns (or puppets!) for Brother Jack and others. The puppet symbolizes not only the racist idea of all African Americans are entertainers (ie the singing scene) but also that Clifton and the Narrator are puppets of society and of the Brotherhood.
Tuesday, April 14, 2009
L'Homme Invisible
The most fascinating aspect of Invisible Man is, for me, the issue of identity. It's so pervasive throughout the novel, and, arguably, the very crux of the Invisible Man's issues-- obviously, invisibility implies a lack of presence and attention, and that's something that comes along with a solid identity or idea of where you fit in the world. I'm just astonished by how eloquently and (seemingly) effortlessly Ellison weaves themes relating to identity into his complex and true-to-life characters... The nameless narrator seems the most difficult to identify, while characters like Dr. Bledsoe and regulars at The Golden Day seem to jump off the page (cliché, I know, but it's the best expression I can use to describe how real each character seems).
On top of their multi-faceted, multi-dimensional personalities, the characters (as previously mentioned) each seem to struggle with a different issue related to identity. Bledsoe initially appears as the epitome of strength and self-assuredness, but his true identity lacks any nobility or genuinity whatsoever; he represents identity misconstrued.
I welcome any counterarguments to this one because it's more of a theory in process, but Brother Jack represents the aggressive battle that ensues when you're uncomfortable with your own identity; whereas Dr. Bledsoe merely conceals his and embraces the multiple stereotypes and ensuing roles that accompany being an African-American, Brother Jack is hasty to abandon anything he deems antiquated or stereotypical, even if these things are integral to his own identity. When he's disdainful of the old African-American evicted couple, I sensed that his scorn arose from a fear of association and a subsequent treatment as an inferior.
Thursday, April 9, 2009
Fast pace...
The part of this book that stood out most to me is how much it made me concentrate on it and read at a fast pace. Before I knew it, I would be 50 or 100 pages into the reading and feel like it had only been 10 or 15 minutes. I find it rare that a book is able to hold my attention that well, as with most of our other readings I have had to force myself to pay attention and finish the readings. I also notice that I read it with a beat in my mind, similar to what the presentation group played in class on tuesday, but still faster than that. This book reminds me slightly of the movie Forest Gump. It is essentially a nobody who is involved in a number of historical actions. He is part of medical testing, when he is injured in the factory and they are trying to use him to replace the ice-pick lobotomy. At the end of our reading he is part of what I assume to be a socialist rally, at least from the context of the book, and the presentation of the group that mentioned Eugene V. Debs, a socialist candidate for president in the early 20th century.
just a couple of things
I found it interesting, as i got towards the meat of the book, that there has been a distinct change in writing style. It wasn't a right away thing - meaning his writing style didn't change between chapters. Just, as i was reading i suddenly became aware that i wasn't 100% sure what was going on all the time and apparently hadn't for pages on end... but i could never turn to that exact point. His more erratic writing style is coinciding with the narrator's loss in identity. As he becomes less 'visible' he seems to allow himself to be open to many more possibilities. It seems like he is using his anonymity that whites have forced onto him to undermine the Sambo stereotype he has been living up until this point. Also, as we talked about in our presentation, his writing style is influenced by Jazz so what appears 'erratic' maybe just 'improvisational'. I guess what i mean by that is it's adding to the book, not taking away from its meaning.
Another thing:
What an absolutely bizarre 're-birth' scene. I suppose it was not unlike how we are brought into the world today... bright lights, lots of strangers overhead, and incredibly disorienting. I could not even imagine what it would be like to be even somewhat cognitive for that sort of thing. Its also a testament to how far medicine and psychological treatments have come over the last century. I mean i know that shock treatment is still readily available (especially for depressive cases) but for that to be the go to solution... geez.
Another thing:
What an absolutely bizarre 're-birth' scene. I suppose it was not unlike how we are brought into the world today... bright lights, lots of strangers overhead, and incredibly disorienting. I could not even imagine what it would be like to be even somewhat cognitive for that sort of thing. Its also a testament to how far medicine and psychological treatments have come over the last century. I mean i know that shock treatment is still readily available (especially for depressive cases) but for that to be the go to solution... geez.
What happens to a dream deferred?
Throughout the Invisible Man’s interview process, I kept hearing the words of Langston Hughes in my head. “Does it sag like a heavy load, or does it explode?” He goes through each emotion in the book – he is terrified as he goes to Dr. Bledsoe’s office that his dreams are ending – he is then hopeful as he moves to NYC only to be struck down again by the letters of “recommendation.” His final explosion to Brockway in the paint engineering room signals a turn for him. His rage at his lost dreams climaxes in the shouting fight of the boiler room.
Stylistically, I’ve been so impressed with Ellison’s use of imagery. I look forward to reading blocks of sentences without dialogue because I know it will hold a very vivid description of the Invisible Man’s surroundings. Each time he describes the scenery, he muses in an almost prose-like fashion and creates the emotions I’m not sure the Man knows how to express. For example, the setting of Mr. Emerson’s office, tranquil and ornate, is a stark contrast between the greasy, oily grime of the engineering room to where the Man must go. In the abrupt change in scenery, the reader feels not just what emotions the Man says he’s feeling, but also a deep sense of undeserved irony that helps communicate the futility of the black educated man in the workforce at this time period.
Referring back to the class discussion on Tuesday, I’m not sure it’s possible to classify the book as solely artistic or solely political. Whatever Ralph Ellison intended, I feel like anyone who reads this book and feels the emotion in it will be stirred to action of some sort.
Stylistically, I’ve been so impressed with Ellison’s use of imagery. I look forward to reading blocks of sentences without dialogue because I know it will hold a very vivid description of the Invisible Man’s surroundings. Each time he describes the scenery, he muses in an almost prose-like fashion and creates the emotions I’m not sure the Man knows how to express. For example, the setting of Mr. Emerson’s office, tranquil and ornate, is a stark contrast between the greasy, oily grime of the engineering room to where the Man must go. In the abrupt change in scenery, the reader feels not just what emotions the Man says he’s feeling, but also a deep sense of undeserved irony that helps communicate the futility of the black educated man in the workforce at this time period.
Referring back to the class discussion on Tuesday, I’m not sure it’s possible to classify the book as solely artistic or solely political. Whatever Ralph Ellison intended, I feel like anyone who reads this book and feels the emotion in it will be stirred to action of some sort.
Ellison's word choice
Something I find incredibly interesting about this book is Ellison's word choice and style of writing. When I read this book I feel like it's one of those endings really built up that you're anxiously awaiting just to see what happens. I can't decide if it is because the narrator has built up he post-invisible life and how he got there so much. He'll go on and on about something and then say something the the point of, "but that was all before I was invisible" and you're kind of back to where you started.
I'm also somewhat surprised at the disconnect between the north and south and the little that the narrator knew about the north. He was so surprised to see Harlem the way that it is which kind of made me surprised to believe that he was surprised. I almost wasn't sure if he was being too naive. When he was discussing Harlem he tried very hard to connect it to the South such as on page 164 when he says, "They reminded me fleetingly of prisoners carrying their leg irons as they escaped from a chain gang." The idea of city traffic is just beyond him. He makes little references to slavery like this quite often actually. He'll try to describe something in a way that hints towards slavery when really it doesn't have much to do with slavery. Another example is on 167 when he says "there was a command in the extended hand, and I obeyed it." There are plenty more throughout the book. It's almost as if choosing to say one word is what makes him say something in a different light than anything else.
I'm also somewhat surprised at the disconnect between the north and south and the little that the narrator knew about the north. He was so surprised to see Harlem the way that it is which kind of made me surprised to believe that he was surprised. I almost wasn't sure if he was being too naive. When he was discussing Harlem he tried very hard to connect it to the South such as on page 164 when he says, "They reminded me fleetingly of prisoners carrying their leg irons as they escaped from a chain gang." The idea of city traffic is just beyond him. He makes little references to slavery like this quite often actually. He'll try to describe something in a way that hints towards slavery when really it doesn't have much to do with slavery. Another example is on 167 when he says "there was a command in the extended hand, and I obeyed it." There are plenty more throughout the book. It's almost as if choosing to say one word is what makes him say something in a different light than anything else.
Lights and invisibility... and speeches
(Sorry the title isn't clever...) Ok. So i couldn't help but notice that there were a lot of ties back to the beginning (some boomeranging, if you will) when Invisible Man is giving his speech for the socialists. The most interesting to me was the fact that the story kept going back to the lights being in his eyes, etc. Obviously, anytime eyes and light are mentioned, the reader needs to start paying closer attention to what he or she is reading.
Like Linnie (I really hope that that is spelled correctly...) I am completely fascinated by the light thing. I, too, was still hazy on its significance the first time I read it so I am really trying to pay closer attention anytime that the lights are mentioned. on page 341 he says, "The light was so strong that i could no longer see the audience, the bowl of human faces. It was as though a semi-transparent curtain had dropped between us, but through which they could see me..."
I wonder if this doesn't have something to do with why he has so many lights in his little cave. The light allows him to be seen. He is making his presence known: even if he is not seen by the public, he knows that he can be seen because he retreats everyday into the light.
Also, the light allows him to remind the world that he exists.
Also, another thing that is boomeranging is the "white lines" (p.343) idea. he ways that they are blind "So now we can only see in straight white lines." In the beginning, when he is driving Mr. Norton, the white lines play a very significant role; before he is in trouble (or when he is paying attention) he strictly follows the white lines or lets them guide him. However, when he is shaky, the white lines are blurred. I think the white lines are pretty clearly standing for the white people who have any power in general...
Anyways, I hope that this makes sense. It's just an idea. There is a lot more to it but unfortunately the idea was formed a few hours before this blog, so... some of it has been forgotten!
Like Linnie (I really hope that that is spelled correctly...) I am completely fascinated by the light thing. I, too, was still hazy on its significance the first time I read it so I am really trying to pay closer attention anytime that the lights are mentioned. on page 341 he says, "The light was so strong that i could no longer see the audience, the bowl of human faces. It was as though a semi-transparent curtain had dropped between us, but through which they could see me..."
I wonder if this doesn't have something to do with why he has so many lights in his little cave. The light allows him to be seen. He is making his presence known: even if he is not seen by the public, he knows that he can be seen because he retreats everyday into the light.
Also, the light allows him to remind the world that he exists.
Also, another thing that is boomeranging is the "white lines" (p.343) idea. he ways that they are blind "So now we can only see in straight white lines." In the beginning, when he is driving Mr. Norton, the white lines play a very significant role; before he is in trouble (or when he is paying attention) he strictly follows the white lines or lets them guide him. However, when he is shaky, the white lines are blurred. I think the white lines are pretty clearly standing for the white people who have any power in general...
Anyways, I hope that this makes sense. It's just an idea. There is a lot more to it but unfortunately the idea was formed a few hours before this blog, so... some of it has been forgotten!
music, identity, lobotomy...
Sorry this is so long, I didn't realize it until I posted it!
After reading over half of Invisible Man, I thoroughly like the book because of the historical references, the symbolism, and the descriptive language. This story is a coming of age novel and also “a man on a journey” (a radio story term) story.
1. Throughout the story, the theme of music and reality vs. the dream world is present in the text. In the prologue, he describes listening to Louie’s jazz as a time stopping sort of out of body experiment (he’s high too). Music is also present in many forms during instances in which he is happy or struggling; the descriptive voice of music comes through and reveals the undertones of the situation the invisible man is in. When he enters Mr.Emerson’s office, which is the elaborate export company office, the exotic birds make shrill noises. This also reflects his mood; he is nervous in anticipation. Another example: As he is reflecting on his discovery of Dr.Bledsoe’s true intentions, he hears a man singing “O well they picked poor Robin clean…Lawd, they picked all the feathers round from Robin’s rump…” (193) In another instance, he was hearing Beethoven’s Fifth too (232). Music doesn’t only play a part in the mood though, it is part of his cultural identity. More specifically, Jazz music is through the Harlem Renaissance that is happening in New York City during this time. When he attends the meeting with Brother Jack, a drunk brother wants him to sing the ‘down south’ songs, revealing that to the outside person these songs identify him (this is on page 312).
2. While the references to music helped me to connect with the text, I was intrigued by the lobotomy performed on him while he was a science experiment for the doctors at the factory hospital. Last week, I listened to a radio piece in my Journalism class about a man who had a Lobotomy as a child… The procedure started off with the doctor sticking an ice pick (yes an ice pick) through the middle of the patients eyes… The link is at the end of the post, and it’s a true story. These procedures were said by those performing the procedure to fix the severely depressed and those with behavior problems. This man always felt there was something missing in his life emotion-wise.
This change in emotion was reflected in the invisible man’s initial reaction upon entering the hospital office and leaving the hospital. He was loopy and out of it, and his emotions were going every which way.
3. There is the constant search for identity. I thought he was closer to finding it after I read tonight’s assignment.. but he is still somewhat lost. It seems to me that the lobotomy symbolized a mental change (not literally though) and the literal change was his rise to action as the old people were being evicted. The following quote showed me that he is becoming a man with his own beliefs who isn’t stuck in the Southern way of obeying his power-hungry leaders. A show of his transition from humility to action: pg.291: “Oh, no, brother…You’re not like them. Perhaps you were, but you’re not any longer. Otherwise you’d never have made that speech…You might not recognize it just now, but that part of you is dead! You have not completely shed that self, that old agrarian self, but it’s dead and you will throw it off completely and emerge something new. History has been born in your brain.” But then he’ll flounder back again to his search as evidenced through his want to find purpose in his jobs: “What was I, a man or a natural resource.”
Lastly, he’s in a group full of white people who call him brother BUT something is still missing. “It was as though they hadn’t seen me, as though I were here, and yet not here.”
Here’s the link to the Lobotomy, it’s a sad story but worth listening to:
http://www.soundportraits.org/on-air/my_lobotomy/
After reading over half of Invisible Man, I thoroughly like the book because of the historical references, the symbolism, and the descriptive language. This story is a coming of age novel and also “a man on a journey” (a radio story term) story.
1. Throughout the story, the theme of music and reality vs. the dream world is present in the text. In the prologue, he describes listening to Louie’s jazz as a time stopping sort of out of body experiment (he’s high too). Music is also present in many forms during instances in which he is happy or struggling; the descriptive voice of music comes through and reveals the undertones of the situation the invisible man is in. When he enters Mr.Emerson’s office, which is the elaborate export company office, the exotic birds make shrill noises. This also reflects his mood; he is nervous in anticipation. Another example: As he is reflecting on his discovery of Dr.Bledsoe’s true intentions, he hears a man singing “O well they picked poor Robin clean…Lawd, they picked all the feathers round from Robin’s rump…” (193) In another instance, he was hearing Beethoven’s Fifth too (232). Music doesn’t only play a part in the mood though, it is part of his cultural identity. More specifically, Jazz music is through the Harlem Renaissance that is happening in New York City during this time. When he attends the meeting with Brother Jack, a drunk brother wants him to sing the ‘down south’ songs, revealing that to the outside person these songs identify him (this is on page 312).
2. While the references to music helped me to connect with the text, I was intrigued by the lobotomy performed on him while he was a science experiment for the doctors at the factory hospital. Last week, I listened to a radio piece in my Journalism class about a man who had a Lobotomy as a child… The procedure started off with the doctor sticking an ice pick (yes an ice pick) through the middle of the patients eyes… The link is at the end of the post, and it’s a true story. These procedures were said by those performing the procedure to fix the severely depressed and those with behavior problems. This man always felt there was something missing in his life emotion-wise.
This change in emotion was reflected in the invisible man’s initial reaction upon entering the hospital office and leaving the hospital. He was loopy and out of it, and his emotions were going every which way.
3. There is the constant search for identity. I thought he was closer to finding it after I read tonight’s assignment.. but he is still somewhat lost. It seems to me that the lobotomy symbolized a mental change (not literally though) and the literal change was his rise to action as the old people were being evicted. The following quote showed me that he is becoming a man with his own beliefs who isn’t stuck in the Southern way of obeying his power-hungry leaders. A show of his transition from humility to action: pg.291: “Oh, no, brother…You’re not like them. Perhaps you were, but you’re not any longer. Otherwise you’d never have made that speech…You might not recognize it just now, but that part of you is dead! You have not completely shed that self, that old agrarian self, but it’s dead and you will throw it off completely and emerge something new. History has been born in your brain.” But then he’ll flounder back again to his search as evidenced through his want to find purpose in his jobs: “What was I, a man or a natural resource.”
Lastly, he’s in a group full of white people who call him brother BUT something is still missing. “It was as though they hadn’t seen me, as though I were here, and yet not here.”
Here’s the link to the Lobotomy, it’s a sad story but worth listening to:
http://www.soundportraits.org/on-air/my_lobotomy/
"This is your new name......< >."
So many different terms and vocabulary used in the book have struck me as interesting. Whether it is a vernacular term because of the jazz era and the time period, or as a term of endearment for each other, the word brother stands out to me. In terms of finding oneself and identity, the word brother seems so weird to the narrator at first on page 294. The word Brother implies closeness, and family, while it seems as if the narrator is invisible and has none. In this sense it is different to him to call someone brother. The second idea that struck me during this reading was the idea of identity on page 309. Brother Jack states "This is your new identity", when in fact, it was his first one. It is a bit frustrating to never know the name of the narrator. Even when his name changes, we don't know what it was or what it is now. As a technique in the book, it is important to the plot of the story and overall an artistic theme which relates to the human aspect of the book. Another example of this invisibility was when the narrator was referred to as "an unknown 'rabble rouser'" on page 331. The overall invisibility is something that all people can relate to and the terms such as "Brother" seem awkward and strange. But possibly, the narrator will feel more comfortable using the term.
Wednesday, April 8, 2009
The Invisible Man is a very intriguing book. The narrator presents many metaphors throughout the book that symbolize many things about his life. After leaving the hospital, the narrator goes on to live with Mary, who somewhat nurtures him in order for him to be able to find who he is and what he stands for. Mary seems to me to be a sort of mother figure because she does not complain about him not being able to pay rent and she helps him as much as possible.
The narrator going to get the yams, which reminds him of his southern heritage, makes me think of him as a kid. He is truly enjoying them so much, it is like a euphoria. When he sees the couple being evicted from their home, he comes of age and finds a calling for himself. He realizes that through speech, he could be helpful the cause. Through his speeches, the narrator also realizes that this would push him further away from the ideas of Booker T. Washington and what the older blacks believed. I do not know if the brotherhood is truly what the narrator his looking for in regards to the path that he wants to take, or if the group is just a means to an end. It will be interesting to read the rest of the book to see where this new life takes the narrator.
The narrator going to get the yams, which reminds him of his southern heritage, makes me think of him as a kid. He is truly enjoying them so much, it is like a euphoria. When he sees the couple being evicted from their home, he comes of age and finds a calling for himself. He realizes that through speech, he could be helpful the cause. Through his speeches, the narrator also realizes that this would push him further away from the ideas of Booker T. Washington and what the older blacks believed. I do not know if the brotherhood is truly what the narrator his looking for in regards to the path that he wants to take, or if the group is just a means to an end. It will be interesting to read the rest of the book to see where this new life takes the narrator.
Repelling and fascinating
I may be out on a very much extended limb with this post, but I cannot help myself.
While the speaker in Invisible Man was watching the men and women outside of the eviction in chapter thirteen, he says "I saw them start up the steps and felt suddenly as though my head would split. I knew that they were about to attack the man and I was both afraid and angry, repelled and fascinated." Whether or not this is an intentional allusion, it reminds me of an article I read in a religion class entitled "The Ambiguity of the Sacred" by Roger Caillois. In Caillois article, he discusses how religious experiences are both positive and negative. He says "It both repels and fascinates. It is taboo and dangerous. It suffices that one desires to approach and possess it at the very moment in which one is keeping a proper distance from it." The speaker is afraid of the crowd and the events that will unfold, but he is also captivated by the entire situation.
The relation of these quotes makes me believe that this scene in the book is a religious experience, or sacred event of sorts. It is sacred in that it differs from what the speaker is used to and he acts in a way that is not like how he had acted previously in the novel. This scene is intense in a way that the rest of the novel is not, and I feel like it was put into the novel as a very significant event that serves as a turning point in the speaker's life.
I am not positive that Ellison intended this scene to evoke a sense of sanctity, but my interpretation of it leads me to believe that it is definitely out of the speakers realm of "everyday".
While the speaker in Invisible Man was watching the men and women outside of the eviction in chapter thirteen, he says "I saw them start up the steps and felt suddenly as though my head would split. I knew that they were about to attack the man and I was both afraid and angry, repelled and fascinated." Whether or not this is an intentional allusion, it reminds me of an article I read in a religion class entitled "The Ambiguity of the Sacred" by Roger Caillois. In Caillois article, he discusses how religious experiences are both positive and negative. He says "It both repels and fascinates. It is taboo and dangerous. It suffices that one desires to approach and possess it at the very moment in which one is keeping a proper distance from it." The speaker is afraid of the crowd and the events that will unfold, but he is also captivated by the entire situation.
The relation of these quotes makes me believe that this scene in the book is a religious experience, or sacred event of sorts. It is sacred in that it differs from what the speaker is used to and he acts in a way that is not like how he had acted previously in the novel. This scene is intense in a way that the rest of the novel is not, and I feel like it was put into the novel as a very significant event that serves as a turning point in the speaker's life.
I am not positive that Ellison intended this scene to evoke a sense of sanctity, but my interpretation of it leads me to believe that it is definitely out of the speakers realm of "everyday".
Feeling Pretty Visible
I really like the twist in personality the narrator is starting to take. The scene with the eviction really displayed a new side of the narrator, a peaceful side which had never really been made prevalent before. The narrator breaking up the brawl over the eviction was incredible, seeing as he had dreams of killing people as well as the violent battle royal (which was then followed by a speech of peace?). Ultimately, I think the change in personality from violent and bitter to at least desiring peace reflects his true inner struggle to find an identity, whether it be by testing two polar opposite roads. Also, I wonder what the significance of the freedom papers being trampled is, as well as the black negro bank getting smashed?
But I think the reason the narrator (which, probably is the most vague sense of identity ever, I mean even Henry Adams would at least title himself "the Young American or Young Secretary, maybe conveying that Adams didn't feel necessarily invisible, just useless , but let me get back to the point <-- Gertrude Stein Style) eventually joins this sketchy brotherhood, which doesn't appreciate his ideologies at first, is because he finds a sense of visibility and identity with the. They see him as a brother and he feels as such, which is probably why he was so threatened when he assumed Brother Clifton to be interested in his position. At least at this point, I feel the the narrator has at least some sense of visibility, whether it be real or not.
P.S cabbage smell funky
P.S.S yams are gross
But I think the reason the narrator (which, probably is the most vague sense of identity ever, I mean even Henry Adams would at least title himself "the Young American or Young Secretary, maybe conveying that Adams didn't feel necessarily invisible, just useless , but let me get back to the point <-- Gertrude Stein Style) eventually joins this sketchy brotherhood, which doesn't appreciate his ideologies at first, is because he finds a sense of visibility and identity with the. They see him as a brother and he feels as such, which is probably why he was so threatened when he assumed Brother Clifton to be interested in his position. At least at this point, I feel the the narrator has at least some sense of visibility, whether it be real or not.
P.S cabbage smell funky
P.S.S yams are gross
Yams = Bliss? For a moment.
Like some of the earlier posters, I found the scene with the yam to be entirely captivating. It seems as if, for once, the invisible man is truly happy as he is doing something he enjoys. I found it interesting that he happened to find this release through food. Food is something that is experienced sensually and it is hard to fake a reaction to food. Thus, by trusting only his senses and not some sort of artificial social code or protocol, the invisible man is able to find something he truly enjoys. The food imagery and the IM's reaction to it also reminded me of the presentation on Tuesday, where we learned that Ellison wrote the book to jazz music. As we learned in class, Jazz is a style of music that is supposed to be emotive, pure and raw, much like the reaction IM has when he eats the yam.
The end of this scene was just as poignant as the outpouring of pure joy. When the Invisible Man takes his last bite and finds that the yam is frostbitten, it is a reminder that this pure joy, life of yams, is not yet attainable for the Invisible Man. As we see in the eviction scene, IM is driven quickly back to his reality and is again unsure of his place in the world where everyone seems to have a purpose for him.
The end of this scene was just as poignant as the outpouring of pure joy. When the Invisible Man takes his last bite and finds that the yam is frostbitten, it is a reminder that this pure joy, life of yams, is not yet attainable for the Invisible Man. As we see in the eviction scene, IM is driven quickly back to his reality and is again unsure of his place in the world where everyone seems to have a purpose for him.
"you want 'em buttered?"
Ellison's Invisible Man depicts the radical change within a young man as a direct result of his experiences. In the first half of the novel our narrator is a young student with the utmost reverence for public figures and especially prominent white men. His enchantment with southern society is evident in his thoughts, speech, and actions; however moving to Harlem signified a momentous change within this character. The most pivotal point in his development was catalyzed by the simple craving of a baked yam, and by indulging in such a southern comfort the narrator was able to cast aside the unconscious shame he had been harboring for years. It was step towards recognizing and accepting his new identity and realizing that he must embrace his own thoughts and act for himself, rather than for the approval of others. After devouring three yams the narrator exclaims, "what and how much had I lost by trying to do only what was expected of me instead of what I myself had wished to do?" (266).
The small victory within himself sparked a sense of empowerment, and spiraled into the provocation of a riot after he witnessed an elderly couple being evicted. The transition to this new identity is complete when he is given a new name, new clothes, and a new address by the mysterious Brotherhood. Who are these men and will the narrator continue to morph into a new and unrecognizable man? What events lead to the situation described in the prologue? The journey has been interesting and thought provoking thus far and I am interested to see how our Invisible Man develops.
The small victory within himself sparked a sense of empowerment, and spiraled into the provocation of a riot after he witnessed an elderly couple being evicted. The transition to this new identity is complete when he is given a new name, new clothes, and a new address by the mysterious Brotherhood. Who are these men and will the narrator continue to morph into a new and unrecognizable man? What events lead to the situation described in the prologue? The journey has been interesting and thought provoking thus far and I am interested to see how our Invisible Man develops.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)